Citigroup to refund $3 million for general v personal advice blurring

A major bank has been ordered to refund over $3 million to 114 retail customers, after an Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) investigation stemming from concerns that customers believed they were receiving personal advice when it was in fact general.

The regulator believed that elements of Citigroup’s practice led to the confusion, after looking into the bank’s sale and provision of general advice for an inherently risky and complex offering, fixed coupon structured products.

The specific practice elements included advisers asking customers about their personal circumstances such as their tolerance to risk, and then providing financial education about the products’ benefits and risks to customers who had no experience in investing in structured products.

Related News:

The compensation ordered by ASIC reflects losses to customers arising from making those investments from 2013 – 2017, with the bank also ordered to write to a further 1,000 customers remaining in the products to allow them to exit early without costs.

The remediation process would be completed by 10 September, this year, and the bank stopped selling structured products to retail clients under a general advice model in January, last year as a result of the ASIC investigation.




Related Content

FPA issues PI warning on legacy AFCA complaints

The Financial Planning Association (FPA) has formally expressed concern about whether professional indemnity insurance will cover legacy complaints be...Read more

FPA helps advisers navigate FASEA

The Financial Planning Association (FPA) has launched an online education portal, Return to Learn, with the intention of helping financial advisers na...Read more

Regulators band together to urge LIBOR transition

Financial institutions need ensure they are preparing to transition away from the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) to other benchmarks, with the ...Read more

Author

Comments

Comments

So how is this different to Barefoot investor recommending everyone Hostplus under general advice? His entire audience misconstrue his general advice as personal advice

Very valid point Anonymous. Should Scott Pape be reimbursing everyone for the purchase of his book. There are plenty of recommendations in the book, not to mention the specific quotes on personal insurance, held within Super. Would love to hear a live story about someone actually trying to make a claim on the Insurance policy held within super and how much (if any) payment was received - but I guess that's still General Advice.

Add new comment