Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Price of advice unlikely to decrease

advice/AFA/financial-planning/super-fund/financial-advice/FOFA/association-of-financial-advisers/

25 July 2013
| By Milana Pokrajac |
image
image image
expand image

Holistic advice services should not be thrown into the same bucket as low-level intra-fund advice when talking about the price, according to head of advice at Australian Unity Personal Financial Services, Craig Meldrum. 

The compliance costs and the extra compliance burden that financial advice has acquired under the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) reforms will make it impossible to “cheapen” the advice, Meldrum said. 

His comments follow the release of an Industry Super Fund (ISN)-commissioned Rice Warner report, which found the average cost of advice would reduce from $2046 to $1163 in the next 15 years. 

“I can’t see good quality advice - where advisers are acting in the full best interest of the client and not in the limited super fund capacity that the ISN is talking about - being less expensive,” Meldrum said. 

“As we go forward you’ll have to pay for quality advice. If you want very poor quality, very limited scaled advice or lesser quality intra-fund advice - which can only look at aspects of your superannuation and so forth - then that will be cheaper.” 

Meldrum said it would be wrong to throw all types of advice in one bucket and predict that the price of those services would be cheaper across the board. 

“I think there will be a division between very limited intra-fund advice that only looks at one or two portions of your financial situation - and very holistic, very professional full scale advice, which is better for best interests of the client,” he said. 

Meldrum spoke at the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) Sydney Roadshow yesterday where he made a distinction between what the financial services reforms required of advisers in terms of acting in the best interest of the clients, and what the current FOFA regime requires. 

Under FOFA, if an adviser identifies advice needs beyond what the client can afford they have a responsibility to notify the client of those needs, but not necessarily make a call about restricting the advice, unlike under the previous regime, Meldrum said. 

“It’s not like you have to provide free advice if the client can’t afford it,” he said. 

“Because we’re not taking commissions anymore, it is crucial that the adviser prices the advice according to what the client needs and what the client can pay for.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 day 3 hours ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 week 1 day ago

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

6 months 1 week ago

Despite the financial adviser exam being rooted in ethics, two professional year advisers believe the lack of support and transparency from the regulator around the exam ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

Australian retirees could increase their projected annual incomes by as much as 51 per cent through comprehensive financial advice, according to a Vanguard study, but cos...

4 weeks ago

After last month’s surprise hold, the Reserve Bank of Australia has announced its latest interest rate decision....

2 days 23 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
74.26 3 y p.a(%)
3