Former planner jailed for seven years
A former financial adviser has been sentenced to seven years' jail after appearing in Queensland's Maroochydore District Court on a range of charges brought by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) including forgery, using forged documents and fraud.
The former planner, Darren John Wise, pleaded guilty to each of the charges which related to his conduct between between 23 October 1997 and 10 March 2006, when, as a financial adviser at Kawana Waters in Queensland, he:
- Created six applications for margin loans on which he forged eight of his clients' signatures, the effect of which was to represent that the clients had agreed to act as guarantors for the margin loans;
- Used the false margin lending applications with the intention of fraudulently inducing the lender to provide him margin loans; and
- On 67 separate occasions gained a benefit for himself by fraudulently lodging securities owned by clients as collateral for the margin loans without the clients' authorisation.
According to the charges, Wise dishonestly obtained a total of $1,070,700 under the margin loans as a result of his misapplication of client assets and used the money for his own purposes including trading in securities on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) for himself, paying for losses in other trading accounts he held, and paying off personal debts.
Recommended for you
With wealth management M&A appetite only growing stronger, Business Health has outlined the major considerations for buyers and sellers to prevent unintended misalignment between the parties.
Industry body SIAA has said the falling number of financial advisers in Australia is a key issue impacting the attractiveness and investor participation of both public and private markets.
As advisers risk losing two-thirds of FUA during the $3.5 trillion wealth transfer, two co-founders underscore why fostering trust with the next generation is vital to retaining intergenerational wealth.
As advisers seek greater insights into FSCP determinations, what are the various options considered by the panel and can a decision be appealed?
