Financial regulators dragging the chain
Australia's three key financial services regulators — the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) — may move with alacrity in their own enforcement activity but have proved less fleet-footed in meeting the needs of the Parliament.
A recent survey conducted by the Rule of Law Institute of Australia (ROLIA) found that when it came to answering questions asked by Senators during Senate Estimates late last year, all three agencies were late more than a quarter of the time, with the ATO being the worst offender.
The survey found that ASIC was late in delivering responses 35 per cent of the time, while APRA was a little better and was late on only 28 per cent of occasions. However the ATO was the worst-performed financial services regulator, being late with respect to 44 per cent of questions asked.
However, when it comes to being really unresponsive to Senate questions, Treasury, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission and the Inspector General of Taxation had the worst records, with the competition watchdog answering only one question on time and being late on 99 per cent of other occasions, while the Inspector General of Taxation did not answer any questions at all in the period — in similar fashion to the Fiscal Group within Treasury which also scored a perfect 100 per cent for not answering questions on time.
Recommended for you
Despite the year almost at an end, advisers have been considerably active in licensee switching this week while the profession has reported a slight uptick in numbers.
AMP has agreed in principle to settle an advice and insurance class action that commenced in 2020 related to historic commission payment activity.
BT has kicked off its second annual Career Pathways Program in partnership with Striver, almost doubling its intake from the inaugural program last year.
Kaplan has launched a six-week intensive program to start in January, targeting advisers who are unlikely to meet the education deadline but intend to return to the profession once they do.
