ASIC striking “significant blow” to Choice members

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC’s) deferral of consumer disclosure requirements for Choice superannuation products could negatively affect retirement outcomes for “millions of unsuspecting Australians”, a major industry body has warned.

The regulator announced earlier this week that fund trustees would have a reprieve on enacting the Choice product platforms until as far away as 2023, as the Government was yet to regulate on what the disclosure requirements would be.

Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) chief executive, Eva Scheerlinck, said this was a “significant blow” to members in underperforming Choice options, who would remain in the dark on their funds’ performance until the deferral ended.

Related News:

“This delay is disgraceful. In a post-Royal Commission environment, we should be prioritising action to help consumers get out of underperforming funds. Kicking the can down the road another four years is unacceptable,” Scheerlinck said.

“Currently, members of many underperforming Choice super products have no way of knowing how their fund compares to industry benchmarks.

“Waiting another four years to get disclosure right could mean another four years of dud returns for the members affected … In the 21st century we should be able to shine a light on underperformance.”

The Productivity Commission estimated in January this year that more than a third of Choice products were underperforming, recommending that Choice product dashboards be enacted as soon as possible. There was significantly more super invested in Choice products than their more highly-regulated MySuper counterparts.

Scheerlinck called on ASIC to make improving disclosure in superannuation a high priority in the wake of the Productivity Commission’s finding, saying that it was a “vital step” in addressing underperformance.




Related Content

Regulators band together to urge LIBOR transition

Financial institutions need ensure they are preparing to transition away from the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) to other benchmarks, with the ...Read more

Budget delivers on ASIC and APRA funding

The Government confirmed its pre-Budget announcements on increased funding to both the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the...Read more

Are financial planners facing double jeopardy?

The risk of double jeopardy for financial planners sits at the heart of the Financial Planning Association’s (FPA’s) concerns about the Australian...Read more

Author

Comments

Comments

Let's calm down on the enacting the recommendations of the RC.
A significant number of the recommendations are flawed in their analysis and the outcome will be a societal disaster.
The recommendations were made by a person who based his conclusions on a distorted review of the industry i.e. he only heard from those who felt they had been hard done by regardless of the facts. His recommendations are based on the outcome for the minority determining policy for the majority.
It's unfortunate the FPA is incapable of articulating this position.

Add new comment