Robust fallbacks required for BBSW

14 September 2021
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) has introduced new criteria that require robust fallbacks for bank-billed swap rate (BBSW) securities, following class actions that each of the big four banks faced in the US.

The new eligibility criteria for securities to be accepted as collateral in the RBA’s market operations included:

  • Floating rate notes (FRNs) and marketed asset-backed securities issued on or after 1 December, 2022, that reference BBSW must include robust fallback provisions; and
  • All self-securitisations, regardless of the date of issue, must include robust fallback provisions. The RBA would engage directly with self-securitisation issuers and give at least 12 months' notice before enforcing this requirement.

While eligibility criteria for FRNs and marketed asset-backed securities issued before 1 December, 2022, were unchanged, the RBA said issuers should strongly consider including robust fallbacks for such securities, depending on their length of time to maturity, as a matter of prudent risk management.

“These requirements are being introduced as part of global reforms to strengthen financial benchmarks and ensure they are used appropriately in the financial system. Financial regulators globally have been urging market participants to make financial products more robust by including fallback provisions to apply if the referenced benchmark rate is discontinue,” the RBA said.

RBA assistant governor (financial markets), Christopher Kent, said: “These new requirements – which have been flagged for some time – are an important step the RBA is taking to encourage further benchmark reform.

“Fallbacks provide important insurance when using any benchmark. If there's one thing that London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) has shown us, it's that we shouldn't take existing benchmarks for granted.

“Although BBSW is currently a robust benchmark, this could change in the future so it is important that robust fallbacks are in place.”

Earlier this year, NAB, ANZ, the Commonwealth Bank, and Westpac last year all faced class actions regarding the trading of BBSW-based products with all four settling the class action. 

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND