To hedge or not to hedge?
Investors are becoming aware that with global exposure comes currency risk and how it is managed can have a significant impact on investment performance, according to Lonsec.
The research house said that the decision to hedge was not always clear and might depend on the investment period as well as where the currency was sitting to its long-term average, with the risk of leaving an investment unhedged to be greater when the AUD moved below its historical average.
“Given that 60 per cent of the MSCI World Index comprises US shares, Australian Investors tend to be most concerned with managing their AUD/USD exposure,” the firm said.
On the other hand, looking back five years, the AUD was at USD 1.02, or 27 cents above the long-term average so the decision to hedge at this point, an investment in global shares would have earned a return of 14.2 per cent per annum compared to a possible unhedged return of 17.7 per cent per annum.
Compared to the situation 15 years ago, when the AUD was at USD 0.61, or 15 cents below the long-term average, hedged returns would have earned 10.9 per cent versus unhedged returns of only 7.1 per cent per annum, Lonsec said.
“The hedging decision can often be a vital one. As the chart below shows, if you had invested $100,000 in global shares 15 years ago, your hedged balance would be $478,000, but your unhedged balance would be $293,000 (a difference of $185,000),” Lonsec said.
AUTHOR
Oksana Patron
Recommended for you
AUSIEX has announced it will acquire FIIG, a specialist fixed income provider with $4.5 billion in funds under advice.
Platinum Asset Management has announced it is in discussions with a global alternatives fund manager regarding a possible merger to create an $18 billion firm.
Frontier Advisors has bolstered its Japanese footprint through a partnership with the $350 billion asset management arm of Nippon Life Insurance Company.
JP Morgan Asset Management has appointed an ETF specialist from Vanguard as it seeks to expand its ETF range.
