ASIC seeks penalties against Mariner directors

3 April 2014
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) will seek financial penalties and disqualification orders against the former and current directors of Mariner Corporation over its unsuccessful proposed takeover bid for listed financial services company Austock Group Limited.

ASIC said it has commenced legal action in the Federal Court of Australia against the directors and has named Mariner chief executive and managing director Darren Olney-Fraser, current director Donald Christie and former director Matthew Fletcher in the case.

ASIC stated that its concerns go back to a market announcement made by Mariner on 25 June 2012 regarding its intention to make a takeover bid for Austock.

The regulator alleges the announcement was misleading since the “proposed bid was at a price less than Mariner was permitted to offer and because it misled the market as to Mariner’s ability to fund the bid”.

ASIC also alleges that Mariner was reckless “as to whether it could perform its obligations under the proposed bid”, claiming it did not have the required financial resources to fund the bid nor did it have commitments from other parties that they would do so for Mariner at the time of the announcement.

As a result ASIC also alleges the directors breached their duties “by failing to give sufficient consideration to the steps that needed to be taken before making the announcement”.

Mariner has released a statement saying the company and its directors have been co-operating with ASIC since the conclusion of the Takeovers Panel hearing in mid 2012 and will be taking legal advice before making further statements.

Mariner’s first takeover announcement was made on 25 June 2012 with the take-over bid withdrawn on 24 July 2012 after Austock received a competing offer from Folkestone Limited, which went on to buy Austock.

Mariner was also unsuccessful in attempting to acquire a controlling shareholder position in Wilson HTM in late 2012 and early 2013. 

The legal proceedings are listed for a directions hearing in the Federal Court of Australia in Melbourne on 12 May 2014.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND