SMSFs not that rewarding for planners

financial-planning/SMSFs/research-and-ratings/financial-planners/investment-trends/commonwealth-bank/trustee/

1 November 2012
| By Milana Pokrajac |
image
image image
expand image

The long-anticipated rise in revenue coming from the self-managed super fund (SMSF) client base is not happening just yet for financial planners, according to new research by Investment Trends.

According to the Investment Trends Self Managed Super Funds: Planner Report, the surveyed advisers derived 21 per cent of their revenue from SMSF clients, despite their rough estimates from three years ago being much higher at 33 per cent.

"Advisers have been anticipating an increase in the role SMSFs play within their businesses for a number of years, but this has not materialised for some," said senior investment analyst Recep Peker.

In fact, Peker said, the crucial SMSF market has proved to be a challenge for financial planners, with many losing ground and deriving a lower proportion of their overall revenue from this client segment.

Only a quarter of the 589 surveyed planners were regarded as SMSF specialists, servicing 20 or more clients in this space.

Peker said non-specialist planners were struggling with the administration challenges, client education about trustee responsibilities, and competition from accountants.

"What are specialists doing differently? Specialists are more likely to have relationships with several accounting firms for referrals," Peker said. "By adopting a more defensive/income oriented investment approach, they are more in tune with their clients' investment needs, and they are more involved in clients' share-trading activities."

SMSFs are the fastest-growing segment of the superannuation industry and the market of choice for planners to tap into.

Even large financial services institutions have been making their move into this space, with AMP acquiring SMSF administrator Cavendish, and the Commonwealth Bank acquiring Count Financial.

"We are also still experiencing significant pressure on fees," said Peker. "Planners are responding to these cost pressures, and have cut ongoing SMSF fees by 5 per cent since the last study to $3,800 per annum."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

5 months 1 week ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

5 months 1 week ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

7 months 2 weeks ago

The RBA has handed down its much-anticipated rate decision, following widespread expectations of a close call....

4 days 2 hours ago

The FSCP has issued a written direction to an adviser who charged clients “extraordinary fees” for inappropriate and conflicted advice, as well as encouraged them to swit...

2 weeks 5 days ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager. ...

4 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
2
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
95.46 3 y p.a(%)
5