Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Should wholesale advice clients be treated differently under PI?

AFCA/professional-indemnity/pi/financial-ombudsman-service/Paul-Harding-Davis/Countplus/matthew-rowe/

17 February 2021
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

Any introduction of a compensation scheme of last resort should generate a thorough review of the professional indemnity (PI) insurance requirements imposed on financial planning licensees, including defining different treatment for retail and wholesale advice clients.

Suggestions of a thorough revision of the PI regime have come amid recent concerns expressed by CountPlus chief executive, Matthew Rowe about the cost and availability of PI insurance and his statement that he is “growing increasingly concerned, from an industry perspective, of the growing level of ‘junk’ Professional Indemnity insurance finding its way into the market”.

Former dealer group head, Paul Harding-Davis said that the answer might lie in actually separating wholesale and retail clients, in circumstances where wholesale clients arguably should not qualify for access to a compensation scheme of last resort.

“If you look at the level of wealth and knowledge expected of a wholesale client then it is arguable that they should not have access to a last resort compensation scheme or to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA),” he said.

“It makes sense that wholesale clients can afford to utilise the courts system and that their financial advisers can, in turn, utilise the PI regime to deal with any remediation,” Harding-Davis said.

His comments come against the background of historic Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) data suggesting that most unpaid determinations were owed by smaller licensees rather than the larger players.

In a recent analysis of the situation facing licensees, CountPlus’s Rowe referred to a “hardening in the PI market” and the need for annual rigorous renewal processes including face to face interviews with major underwriters in London.

“In every renewal with underwriters, we are reminded of the need for technology-enabled, real time data driven supervision and monitoring, conservative and defensible research processes, capital adequacy of the licensee and the need for robust and resourced first, second, and third lines of defence with risk management,” he said.

He said that these were all factors that made it increasingly difficult for smaller players to compete for the limited capital available in the PI market.

“I am growing increasingly concerned, from an industry perspective, of the growing level of ‘junk’ Professional Indemnity insurance finding its way into the market,” Rowe said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 week 3 days ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

2 weeks 3 days ago

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

6 months 3 weeks ago

After last month’s surprise hold, the Reserve Bank of Australia has announced its latest interest rate decision....

1 week 5 days ago

A professional year supervisor has been banned for five years after advice provided by his provisional relevant provider was deemed to be inappropriate, the first time th...

3 weeks 4 days ago

WT Financial’s Keith Cullen is eager for its Hubco initiative to see advice firms under its licence trade at multiples which are catching up to those UK and US financial ...

2 weeks 2 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
74.26 3 y p.a(%)
3