Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Industry first as PY supervisor banned by ASIC

ASIC/professional-year/education/

30 July 2025
| By Laura Dew |
image
image image
expand image

A professional year supervisor has been banned for five years after advice provided by his provisional relevant provider was found to be inappropriate. 

Ian Wailes Potter was a financial adviser and supervisor at Superannuation Advice Australia, as well as the responsible manager of its Australian Financial Services licensee AAN Wealth Management.

Having been nominated as a supervisor, ASIC found his supervision was inadequate and that required documents were incomplete or unsigned. 

More critically, advice provided by the provisional relevant provider was found to be not in clients’ best interests and inappropriate as:

  • Reasonable inquiries were not made into the clients’ relevant circumstances.
  • There was no demonstrated need to move to another superannuation product to meet the clients’ superannuation objectives.
  • The projection graphs and tables provided a distorted comparison of the existing fund to the recommended fund.

In his role as supervisor, Potter was meant to ensure appropriate supervision was provided to the provisional relevant provider and approve, in writing, any statement of advice provided by the provisional relevant provider to a retail client.

Under the Corporations Act, any advice provided by a provisional relevant provider to a retail client is taken to have been provided by their supervisor.

ASIC also found that the documents on the client files were substantially similar and the advice provided was templated without proper consideration of each client’s unique personal and financial circumstances, needs, and objectives.

The corporate regulator told Money Management it believes this is the first time a banning of this type has occurred. 

As a result, he has been banned from providing any financial services, controlling an entity that carries on a financial services business, and performing any function involved in the carrying on of a financial services business for five years.

The banning order took effect from 25 July 2025 and has been recorded on ASIC’s Banned and Disqualified Register.

He has the right to appeal the decision to the Administrative Review Tribunal.
 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 3 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 3 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND