Planners should be answerable on products, says ISA

ISA industry super australia financial planning FPA FSC advice DDOs planners financial advice financial planners financial product design and distribution obligations financial products Senate Economics Legislation Committee Senate Committee design and distribution powers ASIC australian securities and investments commission financial planning association financial services council DDO regime corporations act Royal Commission RC best interest duty

13 November 2018
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Personal financial advice provided by financial planners should not be exempt from the Government’s new financial product design and distribution obligations (DDOs) according to major industry superannuation funds body, Industry Super Australia (ISA).

ISA has told the Senate Economics Legislation Committee that the financial planner best interest duty is not sufficient to allow them to be exempt from the design and distribution powers to be handed to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

In doing so, the ISA has directly countered the arguments put forward by both the Financial Planning Association (FPA) and the Financial Services Council (FSC) that personal financial advice should be exempt.

Answering a question on notice from the committee, ISA said: “A successful DDO regime is philosophically designed to place shared obligations for the responsible provision of financial products on entities across the entire ‘design-distribution’ continuum.”

“By exempting personal financial advice, this continuum of responsibility is broken,” the ISA said.

It said the key justification for a personal financial advice exemption was that advisers were already covered by the best interest duty under the Corporations Act but claimed this was a mistaken perception.

“It is a mistake to assume the best interest duty would provide a similar or comparable test to a target market determination,” the ISA said. “Given the financial advice case studies before the recent Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry, the limitations and problems with the Best Interest Duty have been fully exposed.”

“The argument that a DDO would create confusion with personal advice obligations is also irrelevant,” it said. “The target market determination is intended to define a class of consumers, not individual consumers.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

 
sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

Old Fella

Of course a survey commissioned by an adviser coaching business would find that having an external business coach is a k...

11 hours ago
One foot out the door

A financial planner is expected to earn between $95,000 and $120,000 per year, depending on the state. Really? I don't...

21 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

The whole thing is a bit frightening especially the last note where notes on what might be done could result in the need...

1 day 17 hours ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFS licence of a Sydney wealth firm, the fifth Sydney firm to see a cancellation since the start of the year....

1 week 6 days ago

A former financial adviser has been banned by ASIC from providing financial services for inappropriate advice, among multiple breaches....

4 weeks ago

More than 20 winners from the funds management industry have been crowned at this year’s awards....

6 days 19 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND