Life/risk adviser group demands answers

"financial-planning"/

27 May 2016
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

A group established by life/risk advisers, the Life Insurance Customer Group (LICG), claims it is still waiting for a response from the Financial Services Council (FSC) to claims that FSC members have been failing to adhere to the FSC's Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct.

The LICG wrote to the FSC in late April raising concerns about the reported behaviour of the major institutions which are members of the FSC and suggested that it is those reports about financial services product providers which have been tainting the reputation of the broader financial services industry, particularly advisers.

The letter was written at the same time as a number of life/risk advisers continued to argue strongly against the terms of the Life Insurance Framework (LIF).

The letter to the FSC describe the LICG as "a group of life insurance-focussed advisers" and states that "ordinarily, matters relating to the FSC and members with a focus outside life insurance would not be of sufficient significance for us to comment on".

However it then claims that, "many consumers find it difficult to differentiate between the component services within the financial services sector (advice or product provision) for cash flow planning, lending, investments, insurance, etc., nor can they readily differentiate between advisers, or fully understand any allegiance some advisers may have with product providers".

"In this context all advisers are tainted with media reports on a failing in any of these areas," the letter said.

"In becoming tainted by the behaviour of others, and because of the unsubstantiated allegations of churn the FSC has made against advisers, we have become very interested in all matters relating to the values and behaviours of the FSC."

The letter went on to say that those making up the LICG were arguing "that the lack of clarity as to who exactly is perpetrating what breach, and the lack of industry policing and public reproach, has created the significant consumer mistrust of the financial services sector".

The letter claimed the FSC has been silent on the breaches perpetrated by its members and questioned why this had been the case and suggested the FSC had become disconnected from the insurance sector.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 5 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

4 days 22 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

2 weeks ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo