FASEA urged to align adviser CPD with TPB

5 September 2018
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) needs to ensure that the continuing professional development (CPD) regime it imposes on financial advisers aligns with the Tax Practitioners Board (TPB) regime, according to the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA).

In a submission responding to FASEA’s proposed approach to continuing professional development, the AFA has warned against imposing an unnecessarily stringent regime on financial advisers, arguing that the FASEA standard needs to give due consideration to the requirements that exist in other similar professions.

“It is our view that a total of 50 hours exceeds the requirements of similar professions and the allocation of time to individual categories of CPD requires some refinement,” the AFA said.

The submission said the AFA was very conscious of the additional cost of CPD that would come from increasing the current benchmark of 30 hours to 50 hours.

“CPD activity costs money to attend and it also costs money in terms of time out of the office and away from clients,” it said. “In the context of a range of other cost increases impacting the sector at present, we think that this is an important factor that should be taken into consideration.”

The submission argued that financial advisers would need to comply with both the FASEA CPD standard and also the Tax Practitioners Board’s (TPB) CPE standard.

“The TPB effectively requires tax (financial) advisers to do 20 hours per year, although it is assessed over a three-year period,” it said. “Under the TPB CPE Guidance, it is possible for CPD to count towards the AFSL requirements and also the TPB requirement, where it incorporates a tax element.”

“It is important that the FASEA standard takes into account the requirements of the TPB and that the FASEA approach facilitates CPD activity that will count towards both the FASEA target and the TPB target,” the AFA said. “Otherwise the TPB requirements end out being in addition to the FASEA requirements, which would make the overall hours target even more extreme.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND