Bravura directors urge investors vote for recapitalisation plan
Independent directors of wealth management applications supplier Bravura Solutions have recommended shareholders vote in favour of a recapitalisation proposal for the company to meet its debt obligations.
The directors intend to vote all their Bravura shares in favour of the recapitalisation project in the absence of a superior proposal, according to Bravura chairman Chris Ryan.
“We have considered alternatives to the proposal, including reviewing a number of other unsolicited expressions of interest, but none of these were considered to have the same value and certainty as the proposal.”
He said if the proposal proceeds, Bravura would be able to meet its repayment obligations to its lender, BOS International (Australia), scheduled for August 15 this year.
It will also enable Bravura to “eliminate uncertainty” surrounding Lift Capital margin loans to Bravura Solutions managing director Iain Dunstan and director Simon Woodfull, which relates to a 30.3 per cent of the Bravura’s shares.
On February 4 this year Dunstan and Woodfull received a NSW Supreme Court judgment pointing in favour of them regaining control of key Bravura shareholdings that were tied up as a result of last year’s collapse of Lift Capital.
Investors would have the opportunity to increase their investment in Bravura in a rights issue planned for August this year if the proposal is approved, Ryan said.
Bravura would also reconsider reinstating dividend payments, which it suspended earlier this year, if the proposal and rights issue went ahead, he said.
Recommended for you
Shaw and Partners chief executive, Earl Evans, has said the firm is seeking to double the assets under management at its latest New Zealand acquisition ISG, having made the “left field” decision to embark on overseas M&A.
Advice licensee Count has seen an appeal filed to a class action against it which was dismissed earlier this year.
Going forwards, advisers’ use of platforms will be divided into those “core” offerings and “peripheral” ones, with those in the latter category facing an existential threat.
ASIC has accepted a court enforceable undertaking from a Perth-based company auditor who failed to adequately conduct multiple audits on an advice firm that receivers say has $100 million missing.
