ASIC claims national advice exam to cost $300

ASIC/financial-advice/peter-kell/financial-advisers/financial-planners/financial-planning-association/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/association-of-financial-advisers/

21 February 2014
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

A national exam for financial planners would potentially cost around $300 per head and would be conducted by industry bodies who set the questions, according to the head of Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). 

ASIC chair Greg Medcraft made the comments at the public hearings of the Senate inquiry into the performance of the regulator in response to a question as to whether standard levels of knowledge were applied across the financial advice sector. 

“We saw training in Australia as fragmented but it is not the job of ASIC to micro-manage training. We can manage outcomes but how we get there may vary; however an exam is more efficient and equitable,” Medcraft said. 

When asked what resources ASIC would need to roll-out an exam across the financial advice sector, Medcraft stated ASIC could deliver a national exam at $300 per head with the industry administering the exam and setting the questions. 

He stated that if an exam was delivered across the country it would assist in improving the advice sector and the cost of the exam would mean a “great deal for the savings of the country”. 

ASIC deputy chair Peter Kell said ASIC still had some issues around adviser competencies such as the  level at which they should be set and how they should be tested. 

“In consultation with the industry we found that those who provide personal advice should have a tertiary qualification and they can show that by sitting a national exam.” 

Medcraft said a national exam would also provide Australian advisers with levels of mutual recognition with the US and Canada, and their status would be recorded on a register as an “effective system for holding people accountable”. 

Kell said at present ASIC did not have the ability to track advisers, especially employee advisers, and believed there were 14,000 to 15,000 within the advice sector. 

“If we have a register it would allow us to see who they are, who they work for and where they are going. It would give a picture of industry to employers and consumers as well.” 

The Financial Planning Association and the Association of Financial Advisers rejected the implementation of an exam during the Senate inquiry hearings claiming it would only assess an adviser’s technical knowledge but not their competency to give practical advice. 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 5 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo