ASIC bans former financial adviser over defective SOAs

ASIC/banning/SMSF/

1 September 2025
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

ASIC has banned a financial planner for six years for his role in providing advice to clients to establish SMSFs and invest in the Global Capital Property Fund (GCPF) which is now in liquidation.

Milutin Petrovic has been banned from providing financial services, controlling (whether alone or in concert with one or more other entities) an entity that carries on a financial services business and performing any function involved in the carrying on of a financial services business.

ASIC found that Petrovic failed key advice obligations when recommending clients to invest their retirement savings into financial products related to his licensee, United Global Capital (UGC).

The regulator found that Petrovic asserted to clients that he was only providing limited advice as they sought “execution only advice”, despite telling clients he was required to act in their best interests and providing comparisons to the client regarding their individual existing superannuation fund/s and the recommended SMSF and GCPF investment. The comparison included demonstrating to clients that they would be so many dollars better off by switching superannuation investment.

Petrovic was found to have:

  • Not acted in his clients’ best interests.
  • Not provided advice that was appropriate.
  • Not prioritised his clients’ interests ahead of UGC, his licensee’s, interests.
  • Made statements that were likely to be misleading.  
  • Gave defective statements of advice.

ASIC also found that by purporting to limit the advice in the manner he did, Petrovic provided clients with statements of advice that were defective and therefore engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct regarding acting in clients’ best interests and estimates of future return representations of GCPF.

Petrovic has applied to the Administrative Review Tribunal for a review of ASIC’s decision.

He had also applied for stay and confidentiality orders and that application has been withdrawn. The substantive review application was heard on 30 June and 1 and 2 July 2025.

The decision has been reserved.

The banning took effect from 15 January 2025, was stayed on an interim basis on 28 February 2025, and resumed on 26 March 2025 when that stay was dissolved.
 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

2 months 3 weeks ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

3 months 2 weeks ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

3 months 3 weeks ago

BlackRock Australia plans to launch a Bitcoin ETF later this month, wrapping the firm’s US-listed version which is US$85 billion in size....

4 weeks 1 day ago

The central bank has released its decision on the official cash rate following its November monetary policy meeting. ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

Advice firms are increasing their base salaries by as much as $50k to attract talent, particularly seeking advisers with a portable book of clients, but equity offerings ...

1 week 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo