ASIC accepts EU from Breakaway Finance Group
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has accepted an enforceable undertaking (EU) from Breakaway Finance Group to cancel their Australian Financial Services (AFS) licence, following surveillance by ASIC.
ASIC undertook the surveillance as it was concerned that Breakaway did not sufficiently tailor key policies and procedures to its operations, effectively deal with conflicts of interest, or implement or follow some key policies.
Under the EU, the company also agreed to write to relevant clients who they had advised over the last three years to inform them of the EU and their rights to file a complaint.
Mark Roberts, Breakaway sole director was also under ASIC surveillance. The regulator was concerned that Roberts had failed to make reasonable inquiries into clients’ circumstances, recommended insurance cover to clients unable to afford the premiums, and failed to provide adequate product replacement disclosure.
Roberts undertook in the EU not to provide financial services for two years, which will be recorded on ASIC’s Financial Advisers Register.
He also promised not to act as a director, secretary, shareholder, employee, responsible manager or any other officer of an AFS licensee or authorised representative for two years, and to notify ASIC and complete the relevant training and education requirements before re-entering the financial services industry.
ASIC acknowledged the cooperation of both Breakaway and Roberts during the investigation.
AUTHOR
Hannah Wootton
Recommended for you
With wealth management M&A appetite only growing stronger, Business Health has outlined the major considerations for buyers and sellers to prevent unintended misalignment between the parties.
Industry body SIAA has said the falling number of financial advisers in Australia is a key issue impacting the attractiveness and investor participation of both public and private markets.
As advisers risk losing two-thirds of FUA during the $3.5 trillion wealth transfer, two co-founders underscore why fostering trust with the next generation is vital to retaining intergenerational wealth.
As advisers seek greater insights into FSCP determinations, what are the various options considered by the panel and can a decision be appealed?
