AMP BOLR class action costs to wait
Members of the AMP buyer of last resort (BOLR) class action will have to wait longer for information on any potential compensation after an update from the Federal Court.
A verdict was handed down by Justice Mark Moshinsky on 5 July that the changes to the BOLR policy made by AMP with immediate effect were not authorised under the legislative, economic or product provisions and were ineffective.
Lead applicant Equity Financial Planners is entitled to damages in the sum of $813,560, while sample group member Wealthstone is entitled to damages in the sum of $115,533.51.
The parties are now in the process of determining the impact of other group members and how many practices have BOLR in their contracts.
Following the verdict, both AMP and the plaintiff Equity Financial Planners had to put in orders and a mention was raised in Federal Court on 25 August.
In a brief statement on 25 August, Justice Moshinsky stated that costs should be reserved, meaning no decision about costs will be made until the conclusion of the case.
AMP announced in its full-year results that it has set aside $50 million in provisions for the case, but many feel this is too low and the actual number should be at least double that figure.
The biggest shareholder class action settlement so far was for $200 million paid by Centro property group in 2012. The case centred around allegations of misleading and deceptive conduct that the firm had misled shareholders by failing to disclose billions of dollars in debt that was about to expire.
Speaking at the time, AMP chief executive Alexis George said the $50 million sum was AMP’s “best estimate of the judgment”.
She has also not ruled out AMP appealing the case.
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Recommended for you
Major licensee Count has enacted its latest M&A deal, acquiring the accounting and audit client base of a Sydney accounting firm.
Australian Unity has announced a successor for chief executive Rohan Mead, who will depart the firm after more than 20 years.
Bravura Solutions has appointed a group chief executive following the exit of Andrew Russell, but the successor will be based outside of Australia.
ASIC has clarified the outcome of whether it will “name and shame” AFSLs over their reportable situations and internal dispute regimes following feedback from industry stakeholders.
Don’t costs reserved mean the legal costs are reserved to a later date? Are you confusing this with Damages?
Great result, but what about those of us that on exit had their books devalued by auditors that completed the exit audit of pre FOFA clients on Post FOFA rules?? not entirely fair there either.