Making their voices heard

quality-of-advice-review/

11 July 2022
| By Laura Dew |
image
image image
expand image

At the time of writing, all the submissions to the Quality of Advice Review Issues Paper have now been received, making for interesting reading.

According to Treasury, some 133 submissions were made, including 17 which were confidential and 22 by individuals. Submissions have ranged across professions from law firms, money coaches, superannuation funds as well as financial advisers and their member organisations

What was particularly interesting were the submissions made by individual advisers themselves; member organisations may make Government submissions regularly, but it is much harder to convince an individual person to do so.

It is those, much like the comments page on our website, that give the sharpest insight into views on the coal face of the industry.

Having read through the numerous submissions, the starkest problem which comes up time and again is Statements of Advice and how they are too long, too unwieldly, that investors struggle to understand them and advisers spend hours compiling them.

This is followed by the benefit (or lack thereof) from financial technology and whether it has a place to benefit advisers and subsequently their clients. Advisers agued if fintech was a viable option, then the big banks would have already utilised it and that it did not get to the root cause of the problem which was overregulation. Others said they would like to use it but feared it would be unable to meet the strict regulatory requirements imposed on advisers.

The third topic regularly mentioned was the definitions of financial advice; general advice, comprehensive financial advice, guidance, personal financial advice and so on. Advisers feel the different definitions confuse their clients and leave them powerless to help clients with simple 5-minute problems. (This is also a topic being considered by the Australian Law Reform Commission’s review of financial services legislation.)

The task for the committee and reviewer Michelle Levy now will be to sift through these submissions and pull out what they consider the most-pressing issues.

At least advisers can say they have made their voices known.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 month 1 week ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

2 months ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

2 months 1 week ago

ASIC has canceled the AFSL of Sydney-based asset consultant and research firm....

1 week ago

The Reserve Bank of Australia has announced its latest interest rate decision following this week's monetary policy meeting....

2 weeks 2 days ago

A former financial adviser who stole $4.4 million from his family and friends to feed gambling debts has been permanently banned by ASIC....

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo