Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Super funds charged extra premiums after default 'smoker' classification

ASIC/superannuation/trustees/insurance/amp/colonial-first-state/equity-trustees/IOOF/OnePath/netwealth/Suncorp/danielle-press/

7 August 2020
| By Jassmyn |
image
image image
expand image

Seven superannuation businesses have been found to have been charging extra premiums after classifying new members as ‘smokers’ by default, according to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

ASIC found that AMP, Colonial First State, Equity Trustees, IOOF (including OnePath), Intrust, Netwealth, and Suncorp between 2017 and 2020 had been assigning ‘smoker’ status to members in specific products unless the member took active steps to opt out of the categorisation.

Following engagement with ASIC:

  • All seven superannuation businesses stopped charging new members life insurance premiums at smoker rates by default;
  • All seven superannuation businesses moved, or are in the process of moving, existing members paying premiums at ‘smoker’ rates by default onto non-smoker or blended rates; and
  • Four superannuation businesses refunded or agreed to refund members for the extra premiums paid because of the default ‘smoker’ classification (refer Summary of remediation).

ASIC Commissioner, Danielle Press said, “Generally, insurance premiums for smokers are substantially higher than for non-smokers. Given the low prevalence of smoking among Australian adults, classifying members as ‘smokers’ for insurance offered through superannuation unless the member takes active steps to confirm non-smoking status is contrary to community expectations.

“Insurance in super is complex. Many Australians may not realise that default classifications can impact the price of their cover and therefore, reduce their retirement benefits. In light of the low smoking rate, merely providing disclosure and putting the onus on members to act is not enough to support good member outcomes.

“All trustees we raised these concerns with have ended this practice with new members. Many have decided to refund affected members, in part or in full, for the higher insurance costs. When planned remediation is complete, more than 5,000 members will have received more than $3.6 million in compensation.”

ASIC said if members believed they had been inappropriately classified as “smokers” they should approach their fund, or could contact the Australian Financial Complaints Authority for dispute resolution if they had complaints.

# Entity Trustee(s) Superannuation fund(s) Date ceased defaulting members Date members transferred off smoker default rates Number of identified affected members Refund amounts
1 AMP AMP Superannuation Ltd AMP Superannuation Savings Trust 4 June 2006 In progress 3,492 No remediation
NM Superannuation Proprietary Limited Wealth Personal Superannuation Pension Fund 17 August 2012 25 March 2020 14
2 CFS Colonial First State Investments Limited Colonial First State FirstChoice Superannuation Trust 1 February 2018 1 February 2018 (FCES) 15 October 2019 (FCPS) 3,894 Partial remediation of $2.97 million
3 Equity Trustees Equity Trustees Superannuation Limited AMG Super 17 December 2019 17 December 2019 65 Partial remediation of $34,507
4 IOOF IOOF Investment Management Limited IOOF Portfolio Services Superannuation Fund 30 June 2014 1 January 2020 350 No remediation
OnePath Custodians Pty Limited OnePath MasterFund 17 March 2018 17 March 2018 Approx. 146,000
5 Intrust IS Industry Fund Pty Ltd Intrust Super 31 January 2020 31 January 2020 36 Full remediation of $29,316
6 Netwealth Netwealth Investments Limited Netwealth Superannuation Master Fund 1 January 2017 1 December 2019 1,046 Full remediation of $598,365
7 Suncorp Suncorp Portfolio Services Limited Suncorp Master Trust 5 May 2017 1 February 2020 1,573 No remediation
 
Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 1 day ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 4 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 4 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND