SMSF set-up business penalised $25,000

SMSF/ASIC/

4 November 2015
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

Self-managed superannuation fund set-up business, Superannuation Warehouse Australia (SWA) has been penalised $25,000 for false and misleading advertising following Federal Court action initiated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

ASIC has issued a statement in which it said the penalty related to the company's "Free SMSF Setup" advertising on two of its websites.

The statement said SWA, which provides online accounting and administration services for SMSFs admitted the statements were false and misleading and had consented to the declarations and additional orders requiring SWA to:

  • implement a compliance program;
  • post notices on the websites about the proceeding; and
  • notify consumers who applied to SWA for the free SMSF setup service about the proceeding.

The Federal Court found that between 22 January 2014 and 8 May 2015, the "Free SMSF Setup" statement on the websites was false, misleading and deceptive because it represented that SWA would set up an SMSF at no cost when in fact:

  • SWA's online application form for the free SMSF set up service could not be submitted without authorising SWA to be the fund administrator for which there was a fixed monthly fee;
  • SWA requested applicants to put in place a payment plan for monthly payments of administration fees when it set up the SMSF; and
  • SWA charged monthly fees for its SMSF administration services.

The ASIC statement said these matters were not clearly or prominently disclosed on the websites.

It said that, in addition, between 22 January 2014 and 5 August 2014 applications for SMSF set up with a corporate trustee required a payment of $950 to be made to SWA, without this being clearly and as prominently stated on the websites where "Free SMSF Setup" was advertised.

In the judgment, His Honour Justice Beach found that the "Free SMSF Setup" representation was false or misleading in that:

  1. the administrator consent was required for the "Free SMSF Setup";
  2. the administrator consent affected the costs of the "Free SMSF Setup"; and
  3. monthly fees were required to be paid to SWA for its services.

In the circumstances the setup was not ‘free'."

ASIC deputy chairman, Peter Kell welcomed the decision and said "Deciding to establish a self-managed superannuation fund is a significant financial decision. Consumers should not be misled by advertising, including online. ASIC considers that terms such as "free" convey a strong impression to consumers and should not be used where there is any charge or cost associated with the product or service advertised."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

4 months 3 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

4 months 3 weeks ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

6 months 4 weeks ago

Commonwealth Bank has formally dropped to zero advisers following LGT Crestone’s acquisition of its advice arm – some six years on from the Hayne royal commission. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

The FSCP has issued a written direction to an adviser who charged clients “extraordinary fees” for inappropriate and conflicted advice, as well as encouraged them to swit...

3 days 1 hour ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager. ...

1 week 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
92.15 3 y p.a(%)
3