Corporate superannuation fund members could lose advice <br /> under opt-in

insurance FOFA superannuation fund members financial advice

17 August 2011
| By Chris Kennedy |
image
image
expand image

If opt-in requirements are brought in as part of the Government's Future of Financial Advice (FOFA), it could mean every corporate super fund member would be required to opt in to advice fees individually, costing members access to advice and other valuable services, according to the Corporate Super Specialist Alliance (CSSA). 

This possible outcome of the current round of regulatory changes would result in two types of corporate fund - MySuper funds and Choice funds, and although most employers currently charge a fee rather than a trail commission, it's not clear how this will be affected by opt-in proposals, according to CSSA president Douglas Latto.

"Currently, collective fees are agreed between employers and advisers, and apply equally across all members," Latto said.

Under opt-in, it's possible only individual members would be able to agree to such fees. This would mean advisers would have to collect the signatures of hundreds of thousands of employees every two years, which would be impracticable if not impossible, he said.

Latto added, it is not clear how these proposals would affect corporate super members, and it is an area that hasn't really been addressed.

"Other proposed remuneration solutions include a 'user pays' system, which has been shown to not work," Latto said.

"Under the current system, all users equally share the cost of additional services such as site visits, but a user-pays system is completely reactive rather than proactive, and services such as this could disappear altogether. Members always have the option to opt out through fund choice.

"One of the biggest services the CSSA performs is an advocacy role, including negotiating better terms for members with insurers, benefitting all members on an ongoing basis - another service that would be compromised under opt-in," he said.

Latto believes a proposed ban on group risk commissions within super seems to wrongly assume that group risk is unadvised simply because it is a default or group contract.

But, he said, corporate specialists provide a range of ongoing advice services which are available to all members of the corporate super plan at all times, including ongoing reviews, monitoring, seminars and underwriting assistance.

"If corporate super specialists cannot be fairly rewarded for their services then those services will have to be withdrawn and ordinary Australians will lose access to experienced financial advice professionals, leaving them in the hands of inexperienced call centre staff," Latto said.

Homepage

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Random

What happened to the 700,000 million of MLC if $1.2 Billion was migrated to Expand but Expand had only 512 Million in in...

1 day 10 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

The judge was quite undrstanding! THEN AASSIICC comes along and closes him down!All you 15600 people who work in the bu...

2 days 7 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

How could that underestimate happen?usually the quote transfer straight into the SOA, and what on earth has the commissi...

2 days 8 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 4 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 2 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 4 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND