Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Call to place employers under legal obligation on default super

superannuation/retail-superannuation-funds/superannuation-funds/super-funds/Maurice-Blackburn/federal-court/ASIC/westpac/BT/consumer-protection/Royal-Commission/RC/

17 January 2020
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

History shows that retail superannuation funds might be willing to flout the laws designed to protect consumers when choosing superannuation products, according to plaintiff law firm, Maurice Blackburn.

Citing a recent Federal Court case in which the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) brought charges against Westpac and BT, Maurice Blackburn used a submission to the Senate Economics Legislation Committee to argue that the Government’s new default superannuation legislation could have potential adverse consequences.

“Choice of fund, whilst a worthy goal, comes with dangers,” the legal firm submission said. “Maurice Blackburn urges the Committee to ensure that adequate protections are in place for consumers, should a more open approach to choice be recommended.”

“Where choice is available, consumers are more open to the risk of targeted marketing campaigns by superannuation funds,” it said. “It is worth noting that the findings of the Royal Commission included a specific recommendation11 aimed at prohibiting hawking of superannuation products.”

Looking at the totality of the legislation, the Maurice Blackburn submission said the firm regarded the Government’s legislation as a missed opportunity to implement reforms to ensure employees “are not victims of the abdication of responsibilities in relation to the payment of superannuation by unscrupulous employers”.

It said that for this reason it was asking the Parliamentary Committee to consider embedding in the bill a legislated right for action for damages caused by an employer’s failure to make on time superannuation guarantee contributions.

The submission also calls for the imposition of a legislated obligation on employers to conduct due diligence over any default superannuation fund and “a legal obligation on employers to ensure any default fund they choose for their employees is appropriate to the industry and employee demographics”.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

2 days 13 hours ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 week 2 days ago

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

6 months 1 week ago

After last month’s surprise hold, the Reserve Bank of Australia has announced its latest interest rate decision....

4 days 9 hours ago

Libby Roy has been appointed as an independent non-executive director on the board of AZ NGA....

3 weeks 4 days ago

A professional year supervisor has been banned for five years after advice provided by his provisional relevant provider was deemed to be inappropriate, the first time th...

2 weeks 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
74.26 3 y p.a(%)
3