GFC spurs increased paternalism in legislation
Scaled and scoped advice has received undue focus under the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) legislation, and is a sign of increasing levels of paternalism in legislation, according to legal experts.
Speaking at the Financial Services Council Life Insurance Conference 2014, partner at Herbert Smith Freehills Michael Vrisakis said the FOFA legislation was "undoubtedly a reaction against some of the worst incidents we've seen during the global financial crisis (GFC)".
"The reason there's been all this consternation around scaled advice again goes back to the seed of paternalism; that an adviser could narrowly corral a client into too narrow a scope of advice for the adviser's own purposes, whether that be for a commission or whether that be for a particular service proposition," Vrisakis said.
"And I think the criticism of that which manifested itself in the present [is] that if you allowed scope or scaled advice you really are allowing a further erosion of protection for the client."
But partner at Minter Eillison, Richard Batten, said the reality is that all advice will have to be scoped because few advisers will have the ability to advise on every single type of investment.
"So there's a little bit of mischief-making in some of this discussion, frankly."
Vrisakis said the duty to give appropriate advice still existed regardless of the scope of the subject matter. The adviser will have to warn the client that if they want narrow advice, there could be consequences that could follow.
He argued that if a client comes in to see the planner for narrow advice and the adviser is only allowed to give comprehensive advice, it could end up costing $4000 for the client instead of just $400.
Batten finished off warning: "Be careful what you wish for."
AUTHOR
Staff Writer
Recommended for you
Government has introduced a bill to Parliament to legislate the first stream of the QAR reforms.
ASIC now has a 1:1 ratio when it comes to court success in the enforcement of crypto activities and more action is expected as Treasury seeks to introduce a regulatory framework.
A leading governance body has hit out at “specialist interest groups proposing ad hoc law reform” when it comes to reforms of financial services legislation and believes an independent body is needed.
The release of ALRC’s final report into financial services legislation has highlighted financial advice as a “significant” focus as it seeks to reduce costs and help advisers understand their obligations, alongside the Quality of Advice Review.
