Traditional ETFs better suited to academia
Traditional exchange traded funds (ETF) based on market capitalisation indices are a poor investment model and are better suited for use as academic tools or economic indicators than as the basis for investments, according to Market Vectors Australia.
A whitepaper released by the group also states that traditional indices are not suitable for ETFs because many of the stocks in the index are not liquid and indices are often dominated by large stocks.
Market Vectors indicated this was an area of concern in the Australian market, where the top 10 stocks make up more than 50 per cent of top 200 securities by market capitalisation.
The group stated that equal weight indices were more diversified than market capitalisation indices and outperformed traditional ETFs over the long term, citing a CSIRO-Monash Superannuation Research Cluster research paper published in 2013.
According to Market Vectors, the research paper found that an equal weight index delivered the best long-term performance compared to fundamental indices and market capitalisation indices in the US.
Market Vectors stated that the research found that $1 invested in an equal weight index in 1962 would have grown to $100.86 in 2009, while a $1 investment in a market-cap weighted index would have returned $59.04 for the same period.
AUTHOR
Staff Writer
Recommended for you
Platinum Asset Management has put its two closed-end funds under strategic review in a bid to reduce the share price discount to pre-tax NTA and maximise shareholder value.
In the latest Meet the Manager profile, Money Management speaks with Michael Skinner, founder and managing director at Blackwattle Investment Partners.
Perpetual has seen AUM rise 6 per cent in the last quarter but the departure of a longstanding JOHCM fund manager led to outflows of $2.2 billion from his strategy.
Global fixed income fund Bentham Global Opportunities has been added to several major platforms, enabling it to be accessed more easily by financial advisers.
