Direct property’s delayed reaction

commissions/property/superannuation-funds/cent/industry-super-network/trustee/

29 July 2008
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image image
expand image

Jeff Bresnahan

With exposure to listed property having been identified as the key differentiator in superannuation returns for 2007-08, attention is now being focused on how the eventual re-valuation of direct property investments will ultimately impact the performance of the superannuation funds currently deemed best performers.

Sydney-based ratings house SuperRatings this week released is year-end results for 2007-08 declaring an average decline across the balanced investment option universe of 6.4 per cent with the best performing fund, Vision SuperSaver — Balanced Growth, declining by just 1.70 per cent.

But at the same time, SuperRatings joined Chant West in acknowledging that the key differentiator had been exposure to listed property, which had brought with it losses of more than 30 per cent.

As well, specialist property research house Property Investment Research (PIR) suggested that super funds and other investors with heavy exposure to direct property risked taking a hit when the value of those investments was reviewed.

This, in turn, has raised questions about how often superannuation funds are reviewing the value of their unlisted investments and what impact those revaluations will ultimately have on members’ investment returns and the league tables being generated by ratings houses.

According to the SuperRatings data, the best performing fund in the balanced investment option category for the 12 months to June 30 was Vision SuperSaver - Balanced Growth, which declined by just 1.70 per cent, followed by big public service fund PSSap — Trustee Choice, which declined by 2.07 per cent and MTAA Super Balanced, which declined by 2.14 per cent.

Commenting on his company’s results, SuperRatings managing director Jeff Bresnahan said that listed markets were incredibly volatile at the moment.

As well, he said the gap between the best and worst balanced option over a 10-year period now stood at 5.56 per cent.

The Industry Super Network sought to use the SuperRatings data to prosecute its continuing campaign against adviser commissions by pointing out that industry funds had dominated the top 10 performance positions over one, three and five years.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 5 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

4 days 21 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

2 weeks ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo