ASIC takes action against Aus Unity over DDO failures

ASIC/australian-unity/enforcement/

11 June 2025
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

Australian Unity has been targeted by ASIC for allegedly failing to take reasonable steps to ensure retail investors were in the target market for one of its investment products.

The corporate regulator said on 11 June that it has commenced court action against Australian Unity Funds Management Limited, alleging it acted unlawfully by failing to take reasonable steps to ensure retail investors were in the target market for one of its investment products.

ASIC alleged that Australian Unity, the responsible entity of the Select Income Fund, made three Target Market Determinations between 5 October 2021 and 5 October 2023 identifying the class of suitable investors for the fund. But, according to ASIC, the firm failed to take reasonable steps to ensure retail investors who invested in the fund were in the target market.

During the relevant period, Australian Unity gave prospective investors a questionnaire to determine whether a potential “non-advised” investor was within the fund’s defined target market.

However, the corporate regulator said for much of the period, the questionnaire was given only to online applicants, with paper applicants included from September 2022. Moreover, it alleged the answers weren’t reviewed until August 2023 and weren’t used to screen investors until 6 October 2023, despite ongoing fund issuances.

ASIC deputy chair Sarah Court said: “The design and distribution obligations are there to help make sure consumers get appropriate financial products aligned with their objectives, financial situation and needs.

“Issuers do not meet these obligations just by issuing a questionnaire. They need to actively review investor responses and assess there is nothing in those responses that is inconsistent with the defined target market for the product.”

Court added that in this case, ASIC believes Australian Unity’s failure to review the questionnaires completed by prospective investors exposed people who invested in the fund to the risk that it was not appropriate for them and to potential financial loss.

“Product issuers must take reasonable steps to ensure that investors are within the target market before they issue interests in a product,” Court said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

5 months 3 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

6 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

8 months ago

The RBA has handed down its much-anticipated rate decision, following widespread expectations of a close call....

3 weeks 1 day ago

ASIC has confirmed the industry funding levy for the 2024–25 financial year, and how much licensees can expect to pay....

3 weeks 6 days ago

The Federal Court has made interim travel restraint orders against two Falcon Capital directors, while also freezing one director’s assets....

4 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
2
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
85.26 3 y p.a(%)
5