ASIC makes first civil DDO action against financial product distributor

16 December 2022
| By Laura Dew |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has commenced its first civil penalty action against a distributor of financial products in the Federal Court for alleged breaches of the design and distribution obligations (DDO).   

Firstmac Limited distributed term deposits and other investment products, including interests in Firstmac High Livez (High Livez), a registered managed investment scheme.  

ASIC alleged that in marketing and distributing High Livez to term deposit holders, Firstmac failed to take reasonable steps to ensure that the product was distributed in accordance with the target market determination.  

ASIC also alleged in its action that Firstmac sent High Livez material to 817 Firstmac term deposit customers between 5 October, 2021 and 9 September, 2022.

By adopting a cross-selling strategy of marketing and distributing High Livez to term deposit holders, there was a likelihood that those customers would be outside the High Livez target market, because:  

  • Unlike Firstmac’s term deposits which were guaranteed by the Commonwealth Government in the amount up to $250,000 per account, High Livez was not a capital guaranteed product. The TMD indicated that customers seeking a capital guarantee were not in the target market; and
  • The investment timeframes for term deposits ranged from 30 days to two years whereas the recommended investment timeframe for High Livez was a minimum of three years up to five years. The TMD indicated that customers seeking an investment timeframe of two years or less were not in the target market. 

ASIC deputy chair, Sarah Court, said: “ASIC is concerned that Firstmac’s term deposit customers were exposed to the risk that they might obtain a financial product that was not appropriate to their needs and objectives. 

“Under the DDO, issuing and distributing financial products now requires a consumer-first mindset with genuine consideration of the likely objectives, financial situation and needs of consumers being targeted.”

ASIC was seeking declarations and pecuniary penalties from the Court.   

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Greg

I have passed this exam, and it is not easy or fair exam. It's no wonder that advisers are falsifying their results. ...

2 days 20 hours ago
Ralph

How did the licensee not check this - they should be held to task over it. Obviously they are not making sure their sta...

2 days 22 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

Faking exams and falsifying results..... Too stupid to comment on JG...

2 days 23 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 3 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 1 week ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND