Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Two life/risk advisers enter into ASIC EU

life/risk/ASIC-bans/

21 December 2017
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

Two life/risk advisers have entered into enforceable undertakings (EUs) with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) which will them being overseen by independent experts for the next three years.

The regulator detailed the EUs today, stating they had been entered into because of the deficiencies in advice provided about insurance products.

ASIC named the advisers as Victorian-based Christopher John Cannon and Brisbane-based Danny Charles Pianta.

ASIC said Cannon had entered into the EU after the regulator had outlined concerns that he had:

•             failed to act in the best interest of clients in relation to personal advice;

•             advised clients to switch insurance products when it was not appropriate;

•             in some instances, failed to consider all costs, risks, benefits and disadvantages when advising clients to switch from an existing insurance product into a recommended new insurance policy; and

•             used generic Statement of Advice templates when making Financial Product Advice recommendations to clients.

It said Cannon was a director of PAC Financial Pty Ltd and an authorised representative of Austplan Pty Ltd and that it had been concerned that Mr Cannon's advice about insurance products from June 2015 to August 2016 did not meet the standards required of a financial adviser and that he had failed to comply with financial services laws.

It said Cannon acknowledged that ASIC's concerns about his advice were reasonably held and it, in turn, acknowledged Cannon’s cooperation through the investigation.

Dealing with Pianta, ASIC said it was concerned that his advice about insurance products from June 2015 to August 2016 did not meet the standards required of a financial adviser and that he had failed to comply with financial services laws.

In particular, ASIC was concerned that Mr Pinata:

•             failed to act in the best interest of clients in relation to personal advice;

•             advised clients to switch insurance products when it was not appropriate;

•             in some instances, failed to consider all costs, risks, benefits and disadvantages when advising clients to switch from an existing insurance product into a recommended new insurance policy; and.

ASIC said Pianta acknowledged that ASIC's concerns about his advice were reasonably held.

ASIC acknowledged Pianta's cooperation with ASIC through its investigation.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

6 days 22 hours ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 week 6 days ago

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

6 months 2 weeks ago

After last month’s surprise hold, the Reserve Bank of Australia has announced its latest interest rate decision....

1 week 1 day ago

Libby Roy has been appointed as an independent non-executive director on the board of AZ NGA....

4 weeks 1 day ago

A professional year supervisor has been banned for five years after advice provided by his provisional relevant provider was deemed to be inappropriate, the first time th...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
74.26 3 y p.a(%)
3