Timeframe not an issue with investors
New research has revealed superannuation investors are not concerned with a product’s timeframe, because they are unaware of the implications this could have on their decision.
FuturePlus general manager of client services John Livanas said investors were unresponsive to the intended timeframe of their portfolios to achieve their investment returns, prompting a need for more education.
“I was astonished to find that investors seemed indifferent to the time horizon of their chosen portfolios, whether the maturity profile was one, five or even 10 years,” he said.
“The implication is that, though the superannuation industry has educated investors on the risk-return equation, there may still be a lot of work to do in informing investors on the implications that a product’s timeframe has on different decisions.”
The in-depth survey involved 238 investors who had considered investment changes over the previous year, plus data from 4,000 super fund members who had changed their investments over the past five years.
Recommended for you
Results are out for the latest sitting of the ASIC financial advice exam, with the pass rate falling for the second consecutive sitting.
Adviser losses for the end of June have come in 143 per cent higher than the same period last year, and bring the total June loss to over 350.
ASIC’s enforcement action is having an active start to the new financial year, banning a former Queensland financial adviser for 10 years in relation to fees for no service conduct.
ASIC has confirmed the industry funding levy for the 2024–25 financial year, and how much licensees can expect to pay.
