The ‘ticking time bomb’ of the first QAR tranche
Appearing before the Senate economics committee, WT Financial managing director Keith Cullen has described the first tranche of the Quality of Advice Review (QAR) as a “ticking time bomb”.
Representing the Joint Licensee Group, Cullen and Fortnum Private Wealth managing director Neil Younger discussed their concerns over the first tranche of the reforms with the committee on 13 June.
He was specifically concerned about section 99FA around superannuation trustees and payments to financial advisers, which is a topic that has been raised by numerous industry experts.
Among the requirements is an assurance of an unspecified kind that the financial product advice is personal advice and is wholly or partly about the member’s interest in the fund, and that the amount charged does not exceed the cost of providing financial product advice about the member’s interest in the fund.
The legislation also outlines that a trustee is not required to agree to the member’s request to charge the relevant costs even when the requirements are satisfied.
“The bill as currently drafted is a ticking time bomb, it threatens the financial wellbeing of Australians. It aims to reshape provisions for advice fee deductions from super in a way that will inflate costs with redundant compliance requirements and potentially devastate access to advice while adding no value for the consumer,” Cullen stated.
“The proposed changes add nothing but confusion, cost and uncertainty when this is the exact opposite of what was sought to be achieved.”
He estimated the cost burden of the change regarding scrutiny of advice documents would be $400 per member request.
“This will siphon off literally hundreds of millions of dollars from consumers’ retirement savings annually. That doesn’t only make advice unaffordable, it’s a sabotage of consumer financial security.”
Cullen said “robust” obligations are already in place for AFSLs to ensure that advice fee deductions are legitimate as do superannuation trustees, which makes the need for extra legislation unnecessary in their current format.
Also appearing before the committee, Younger added that the licensees are not against the wider aims of the Quality of Advice Review, but on ensuring it is implemented efficiently.
“We have not expressed concern over the intent of the bill nor with 99FA but with its practical application.
"Anything that acts counter to an efficiency dividend will act counter to access to advice and certainly act counter to the cost of advice.
“We see this as an important form of legislation and critical in its endeavor, but it is necessary to get it right on the way through.”
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Recommended for you
ASIC’s enforcement action is having an active start to the new financial year, banning a former Queensland financial adviser for 10 years in relation to fees for no service conduct.
ASIC has confirmed the industry funding levy for the 2024–25 financial year, and how much licensees can expect to pay.
Australian licensees are expected to make greater use of custom model portfolios for their clients, according to State Street Investment Management, following in the footsteps of US peers.
Adviser Ratings has argued that it’s time for more advisers to utilise digital engagement tools available to them as a disconnect grows between consumers seeking advice from finfluencers and from professionals.
Well done Keith and Neil, these Canberra Bureaucrats need to be stopped.