Survey finds ‘independent’ adviser clients more satisfied
Investors who have independent advisers as opposed to ‘attached’ advisers are “significantly more satisfied with the planners’ advisory process”, according to a survey by the University of Adelaide business school.
The Internet-based survey, entitled ‘Are Investors better off with Financial Advisers? — Perceptions of Australian Investors’, was conducted last year by Dr Akbar Z Ali, director of the university’s undergraduate program.
The research was conducted to understand Australian investors’ perception of ‘independent’ and ‘attached’ advisers, and the level of satisfaction derived from their advisory relationship, he said.
It found specifically that ‘independent’ advisers are better able to understand their clients’ financial circumstances, objectives and constraints.
Independent advisers are also perceived to recommend products that match a client’s investment objectives by recommending a product list restricted only by the quality of product and not by their affiliation with product providers.
Another key finding was that independent advisers are strong advocates of their advisers’ services to their colleagues, compared to clients with attached advisers.
Recommended for you
EY has broken down which uses of artificial intelligence are presenting the most benefits for wealth managers as well as whether it will impact employee headcounts.
Advice licensee Sequoia Financial Group has promoted Sophie Chen as an executive director, following her work on the firm’s Asia Pacific strategy.
The former licensee of Anthony Del Vecchio, a Melbourne adviser sentenced for a $4.5 million theft, has seen its AFSL cancelled by ASIC after a payment by the Compensation Scheme of Last Resort.
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority has reported an 18 per cent increase in investment and advice complaints received in the financial year 2025, rebounding from the previous year’s 26 per cent dip.
