Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Super fund telephone consultant gave wrong personal advice

personal-advice/super-funds/superannuation-funds/SCT/superannuation-complaints-tribunal/general-advice/non-concessional-contributions/contribution-cap/complaints/ATO/australian-taxation-office/

18 January 2019
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

A superannuation fund has been required to make good a member’s excess contributions tax and pay interest on the amount, after the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal (SCT) found telephone advice provided by the fund led to her exceeding concessional contributions limits.

What is more the SCT has rejected a claim by the superannuation fund that the advice represented “general advice”.

An SCT determination (D18-19\084), handed down late last year, found that the superannuation fund needed to compensate the member because she had received misleading advice.

The determination said that the SCT “considers the Complainant has argued essentially, that because the Trustee’s representative advised her exactly how much she could contribute by way of non-concessional contributions, without exceeding the Contribution Cap, she was entitled to rely upon that advice”.

“That the advice was erroneous means that she is entitled to be compensated by the Trustee for the Excess Contribution Tax,” the determination said.

It said that while the superannuation fund had submitted that “information provided by phone consultants was of a general nature only and based on the relevant contribution limits at the time”, the SCT considered that “if the Trustee’s representative gave incorrect advice that was specific to the Complainant’s circumstances, and she relied upon it to her detriment, the Trustee is responsible for that failure”.

The SCT referred to telephone transcripts between the member and the telephone consultant and said it considered the consultant had given the complainant advice, taking into account her particular circumstances and that this represented personal advice.

The SCT ordered that the superannuation compensate the member for $16,275 plus interest payable at the fund’s cash rate from the data the member made her payment of Excess Contribution Tax to the Australian Taxation Office, 15 September, 2015.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 3 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 3 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND