Regulatory investment a 'good faith' move
Although the corporate regulator will take a ‘reasonable’ approach towards enforcing the new October regulations, having the right systems in place to show “good faith” towards compliance will help licensees if they get into any trouble, according to Advice Regtech.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) said last week that it would take a “reasonable” approach at the early stage of the October reforms, which included breach reporting.
The corporate regulator was empathetic to the fact it would require significant changes to businesses.
Samantha Clarke, Advice RegTech chief executive and co-founder, said they had been getting approached because it showed advisers had acted in good faith by being pro-active.
“The guidance from ASIC has said as long AFSL’s [Australian financial services licensees] are endeavouring to act in good faith to understand what the relevant reportable situations are,” Clarke said.
“As long as they’ve got the systems and processes and they’re endeavouring to get on top of that by bringing on more systems, they won’t necessarily be more lenient, but they’ll take that into consideration as part of their assessment and judgements.”
In its draft regulatory guide for breach reporting (RG 78), ASIC said: “We consider that having robust breach reporting systems, processes and procedures in place is a key component of a licensee’s compliance and risk management framework”.
This sentiment was echoed at the Financial Services Council (FSC) Life Insurance Summit in April, where ASIC said there would be a focus on the spirit of policy when it comes to defining upcoming compliance regulations.
“The thing that stands out to me is compliance with the spirit of the policy intent, rather than a strict and literal understanding of what requirements are,” Emma Curtis, ASIC senior executive leader – insurers, financial services and wealth group, said.
AUTHOR
Chris Dastoor
Recommended for you
Financial advisers are reminded to ensure their CPD is up to date with the Financial Services and Credit Panel making its second determination in a week after an adviser failed to meet the requirements.
An adviser has received a written reprimand from the Financial Services and Credit Panel after failing to meet his CPD requirements, the panel’s first action since June.
While efficiency remains a top priority for Australian advisers, State Street has revealed the profession is now juggling this desire with the need to maintain personalisation of its service offering.
A possible acquisition of data provider Iress is becoming a greater likelihood after the firm announced it is engaging with multiple interested parties.
