Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Regulation delaying speed of super fund advice: Boal

Stephen-Jones/Deloitte/andrew-boal/financial-advice/

31 October 2024
| By Laura Dew |
image
image image
expand image

Deloitte’s Andrew Boal believes digital advice delivered by superannuation funds is years away yet and will be hindered by the regulatory differences between financial advice and financial product advice. 

Boal, who is partner-actuarial consulting at Deloitte, said super funds offering advice won’t be the solution to the financial advice accessibility problem in the short term. 

Under the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) legislation, Minister for Financial Services Stephen Jones is pushing for super funds to provide advice to their members as a way to close the advice gap. This includes a new class of adviser called “qualified adviser”, who will have a lower barrier to entry than full financial advisers.

Last month, Cbus announced it will offer a financial advice offering for members and their partners called Advice Essentials Plus. This will charge members and their spouse $990 to access “internal financial experts”.

In an analysis article with his colleague Neil Brown, national investment and wealth management leader, the pair wrote about the ability and viability of super funds to successfully build a hybrid advice model. 

“One problem is that for super funds to provide financial advice at scale, they will need to introduce a hybrid model where advice is delivered digitally as well as in-person. However, building these digitised financial advice businesses will take years and require substantial investment in digital technology and GenAI capabilities. 

“This will be difficult for super funds to do at speed while also balancing industry consolidation, increasing competition, and ongoing political and regulatory pressures to keep fees low. 

“To truly close the advice gap, more needs to be done to bring down regulatory barriers overall. For example, we believe there is an important distinction between financial advice and financial product advice, and this difference should be acknowledged within the regulatory framework, taking into account the likelihood and severity of any potential consumer harm.”

The pair also questioned current anti-hawking provisions and how super funds will be able to engage with members without considering the merits of their own retirement product. 

Finally, they felt the provision of limited advice to address occasional needs, which will help with consumers’ financial knowledge, build trust and foster stronger relationships. 
 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

2 days 19 hours ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 week 2 days ago

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

6 months 1 week ago

After last month’s surprise hold, the Reserve Bank of Australia has announced its latest interest rate decision....

4 days 15 hours ago

Libby Roy has been appointed as an independent non-executive director on the board of AZ NGA....

3 weeks 4 days ago

A professional year supervisor has been banned for five years after advice provided by his provisional relevant provider was deemed to be inappropriate, the first time th...

2 weeks 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
74.26 3 y p.a(%)
3