Question mark over future pricing of planning practices

financial-planning/financial-planning-businesses/financial-planning-practices/financial-planning-industry/FPA/IFSA/

9 July 2009
| By Lucinda Beaman |
image
image image
expand image

Structural reform regarding commission payments in the financial planning industry is creating uncertainty around the future sale prices of planning practices.

Financial planning businesses have traditionally been valued on a multiple of annual recurring revenue, including trail commissions on investments, which clients have historically been unable to ‘turn off’.

But under recommendations being made by the Financial Planning Association (FPA) and the Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA), clients will be able to ‘turn off’ trail commissions on investments made after 2012 if they feel they are not receiving value from their adviser.

Chris Wrightson of Centurion Market Makers said there are various views on the impact the removal of guaranteed trail commissions will have on the potential purchase price of financial planning businesses.

One view is that “given the valuation reliance on annual recurrent revenue, eliminating trail commissions could reduce the value of practices and of client books”, Wrightson said.

An alternative view is that books of business with ongoing trail commissions attached (ie, those that are ‘grandfathered’ under the FPA and IFSA recommendations) will in fact become “a valuable legacy”.

“Over time the diminishing supply of these books could potentially increase their value,” he said.

Wrightson said financial planning practices have historically attracted “quite high valuations compared to small businesses in other industries”. These valuations have been supported by projected superannuation growth rates, the certainty of income provided by trail commissions, as well as the valuations set in ‘buyer of last resort’ facilities by institutions.

Wrightson said many financial planning practices are already separating advice and investment management fees. He believes doing so is one way for planners to have “greater ownership of the advice fee” and deliver certainty to the annual income of their practice.

He believes redefining a practice’s advice offer can also lead to increased revenue.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 month 1 week ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

2 months ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

2 months 1 week ago

ASIC has canceled the AFSL of Sydney-based asset consultant and research firm....

1 week ago

The Reserve Bank of Australia has announced its latest interest rate decision following this week's monetary policy meeting....

2 weeks 2 days ago

A former financial adviser who stole $4.4 million from his family and friends to feed gambling debts has been permanently banned by ASIC....

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo