Practice development overshadowed by regulatory ‘noise’


Regulatory “noise” is the biggest challenge to business growth in the advice industry and statements of advice (SoA) are the most burdensome compliance regime, according to a panel of advisers.
Speaking at the Money Management practice management webinar, Jill Tunkin, Lifespan Financial Planning national practice consultant, said practice development and management was being overshadowed by compliance and noise.
“There’s a lot of regulatory change in the industry and that creating a lot of noise coming through which is easy to allow you to lose sight of practice management and the benefits it can provide,” Tunkin said.
“Licensees are more focused on regulation chaos rather than growing and developing their business; tech seems to be a real trial and error exercise and advisers are left to solve these issues themselves.”
Tunkin said the SoA was the most burdensome compliance regime – and there was no shortage of competition for that title.
“If you just look at what’s on the table at the moment with regulation change – you’ve got opt-in, ongoing fee arrangements, fee disclosure statements (FDS), fixed-term agreements, consent, breach reporting and DDO [design and distribution obligation] requirements – so that’s just a list of what’s on an adviser’s plate at the moment and that’s creating a lot of fatigue,” Tunkin said.
“At the end of the day, all those burdens seem to fall on the planner – the advisers need to work through the changes, they need to understand them and how it flows through the value chain in their practice.”
Tracey Sofra, Sofcorp Wealth Financial Advisors principal and financial adviser, agreed that producing an SoA and making sure it was good from start to end was burdensome.
“The burden of the opt-in and FDS has just been an absolute nightmare aligning dates with reviews,” Sofra said.
“We are spending so much time trying to align dates to make sure we are compliant with FDS and opt-ins.
“From that point of view, it’s extremely frustrating and you wonder what the hell we’re doing in the industry.”
When it came to tech being a solution, Tunkin said she fielded queries on a daily basis that asked about technology options, but these were generally all assessed by way of cost.
“When you’re in a practice and you have margin pressure – which would describe the current environment – there’s always that tendency to work through the tangible which is that cost rather than the measure of value,” Tunkin said.
Recommended for you
As advisers risk losing two-thirds of FUA during the $3.5 trillion wealth transfer, two co-founders underscore why fostering trust with the next generation is vital to retaining intergenerational wealth.
As advisers seek greater insights into FSCP determinations, what are the various options considered by the panel and can a decision be appealed?
Amid the current financial adviser shortage, advice firm Link Wealth is looking to expand its financial literacy program for high school students across the country.
TAL Risk Academy has updated its range of ethics courses to help financial advisers meet their CPD requirements following adviser feedback, including interpreting FSCP determinations.