Mortgage Choice planners not impacted by grandfathering changes
Publicly-listed mortgage broking and financial advice business, Mortgage Choice, believes its planners will emerge substantially unscathed from the removal of grandfathered commissions from 1 January, 2021, but has acknowledged key impacts on its mortgage business.
In a release to the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), Mortgage Choice chief executive, Susan Mitchell said the Royal Commission’s recommendations regarding broker remuneration needed to be thought through carefully.
“The proposed changes could have a large impact on the mortgage broking industry and therefore competition within the home lending sector,” she said. “Ultimately they could give more pricing power to the major banks which would lead to less choice, less access to credit and higher interest rates for consumers.”
Mitchell noted that the Government had proposed a ban on trailing commissions on new loans from 1 July, 2020 while trails on existing loans would remain unaffected. However, she also noted that the Government proposed a further review of broker remuneration in three years’ time.
“These are potentially significant changes which require careful consideration to ensure they do not have counter-productive consequences for the home loan market,” she said.
Mitchell said that where grandfathered commissions and financial advice were concerned, the impacts would be minimal for the Mortgage Choice Financial Planning business as the model had no reliance on grandfathered commissions.
Recommended for you
ASIC has issued infringement notices to two AFSLs over financial advisers providing personal advice while they were unregistered.
Australian retirees could increase their projected annual incomes by as much as 51 per cent through comprehensive financial advice, according to a Vanguard study, but cost continues to be an issue.
AMP has announced a senior appointment to its North leadership team, reinforcing the firm’s commitment to the advice industry.
Despite the financial adviser exam being rooted in ethics, two professional year advisers believe the lack of support and transparency from the regulator around the exam is unethical.
