Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

July FASEA exam problem areas highlighted

FASEA/fasea-exam/exam/

1 September 2021
| By Chris Dastoor |
image
image image
expand image

Knowledge of when to provide key documentation to retail clients, identifying breaches, and understanding the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) code of ethics are key problem areas in the latest FASEA exam results.

A record low 60% passed the July exam, which had 30% of candidates re-sitting as opposed to the recent average of 20%.

There were 14,070 passes recorded on the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) Financial Adviser Register (FAR).

According to data supplied by Wealth Data, there were currently 19,076 registered advisers on the FAR.

Under financial advice regulatory and legal obligations exam takers underperformed in:

  • Demonstrating knowledge of when practitioners were required by law to provide a retail client with key documentation e.g. financial services guides/statements of advice etc.;
  • Demonstrating knowledge of the components of key advice documentation that was provided to the client;
  • Evaluating case studies and identifying breaches of financial disclosure obligations;
  • Applying relevant sections of the Corporations Act when identifying responsible provider obligations, including breaches of those obligations; and
  • Applying Tax Agents Services Act 2009 requirements to scenarios and identifying compliance and non-compliance.

Under applied ethical and professional reasoning and communication exam takers underperformed in:

  • Demonstrating an understanding of the relationship of FASEA code to professionalism of entire industry;
  • Applying best interests duty and associated obligations to clients in scenario based problems; and
  • Identifying sources of judgement and biases and their influence on financial advice.

Under financial advice construction exam takers underperformed in:

  • Demonstrating an understanding of the context in which financial advice was given and requested and how this impacts decision making; and
  • Identifying inappropriate advice and how to comply with the code of ethics.

Over 1,700 advisers had booked for the September exam, to be held in metropolitan and regional locations (subject to COVID-19 protocols) and via remote proctoring from 9 to 14 September, 2021.

Over 320 advisers had booked for the November exam, which be held in person and online from 11 to 16 November, 2021.

Registrations had closed for the September exam, but the November exam bookings would closed on 29 October, 2021.

FASEA previously said it intended to give September exam takers their result before the 29 October deadline, so unsuccessful candidates would be able to register once their result was confirmed.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 week 1 day ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

2 weeks 1 day ago

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

6 months 2 weeks ago

After last month’s surprise hold, the Reserve Bank of Australia has announced its latest interest rate decision....

1 week 3 days ago

A professional year supervisor has been banned for five years after advice provided by his provisional relevant provider was deemed to be inappropriate, the first time th...

3 weeks 2 days ago

WT Financial’s Keith Cullen is eager for its Hubco initiative to see advice firms under its licence trade at multiples which are catching up to those UK and US financial ...

2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
74.26 3 y p.a(%)
3