Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

FPA Dealer Principal Conference – Exit plan adds value

financial-planning/commissions/financial-planning-business/financial-planning-firms/financial-planning-practice/

31 August 2000
| By John Wilkinson |

The difference in valuation between an average financial planning business and a premium business can vary by up to $370,000 depending on a number of factors, says MGI Meyrick Webster senior partner Bob Neill.

His accountancy practice has recently valued a number of financial planning firms to allow succession plans to come into force.

"We see a lot of small, fragmented businesses that have strong goodwill based on an individual," he says.

When his practice values planning firms, it looks at turnover, profit and capital base, the same principles for valuing any firm.

The differences with planning firms are factors such as geographical location, business structure, funds under management and brand names.

"If the business has a managed style that ensures procedures are repeatable and transparent, then we have a marketable business," Neill says.

"And if we have a turnkey operation, the business is a significantly more valuable asset."

A growing threat to financial planning practice valuations is litigation. Neill admits that industry regulations are making the planner more liable and litigation is inevitable in the future.

Other factors affecting the valuation include client demographics, income streams and the fact that fees are better than commissions. Automation of the practice leads to more efficiency and the staff is also considered.

Neill quoted a case study of an average financial planning firm with a turnover of $1 million and $300,000 profits. The practice had $75 million of funds under administration.

The value range of this business would be between $1.296 million and $1.386 million.

If the same figures were applied to a premium financial planning firm, the value would be between $1.665 million and $1.758 million.

To achieve the higher valuation Neill recommends principals start thinking about the method of disposing of the company four to five years ahead.

"This timescale will allow the principal to achieve their valuation goal through understanding the factors that influence the value of the practice," he says.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 week 2 days ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

2 weeks 2 days ago

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

6 months 2 weeks ago

After last month’s surprise hold, the Reserve Bank of Australia has announced its latest interest rate decision....

1 week 4 days ago

A professional year supervisor has been banned for five years after advice provided by his provisional relevant provider was deemed to be inappropriate, the first time th...

3 weeks 3 days ago

WT Financial’s Keith Cullen is eager for its Hubco initiative to see advice firms under its licence trade at multiples which are catching up to those UK and US financial ...

2 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
74.26 3 y p.a(%)
3