Federal Court imposes first best interest duty breach fine
The Federal Court has imposed a civil penalty of $1 million against Melbourne-based financial advice firm, NSG Services for breaches of the best interests duty, the first civil penalty imposed on a financial services licensee for a breach of the best interests duty.
The penalty was in relation to financial advice provided to retail clients by NSG advisers on eight occasions between July 2013 and August 2015. The clients were usually sold insurance and were advised to roll over superannuation accounts that committed them to expensive, unsuitable and unnecessary financial arrangements.
The court found NSG’s failure to ensure compliance by its representatives were systemic in nature. In his reasons, Justice Moshinsky said, “I regard the contraventions as very serious ones”.
The court found NSG representatives breached the Corporations Act by failing to take reasonable steps to ensure they provided advice that complied with best interests obligations, and that the advice provided was appropriate to clients.
The breaches formed the basis of 20 contraventions in total by the firm.
The court made declarations based on various deficiencies in NSG’s processes and procedures, including insufficient training on legal and regulatory obligations to ensure advice was in the clients’ best interest.
NSG also had a “commission only” remuneration model, which meant representatives would be paid commissions for sales of personal risk insurance products and superannuation rollovers.
ASIC deputy chair, Peter Kell, said: “This outcome makes clear to the industry the serious consequences of financial services licensees failing to comply with their FOFA [Future of Financial Advice] obligations. ASIC will continue to pursue licensees who fail to do so”.
NSG agreed to pay the amount immediately and made joint submissions to the orders, and was also ordered to pay $50,000 in costs to ASIC, and will also pay $50,000 towards ASIC’s investigation costs under the ASIC Act.
AUTHOR
Malavika Santhebennur
Recommended for you
With AMP advisers moving to Entireti and Insignia being the subject of a private equity bidding war, how can deals be navigated to ensure minimal stress and uncertainty for staff and advisers?
There are seven key mistakes that financial advice businesses need to steer clear of in 2025 to avoid hindering their business growth and profitability, according to Adviser Ratings.
The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would affect financial advisers.
While advisers are increasingly eyeing private markets and alternative investments, two reports have underlined the lack of investor understanding that persists among both advisers and clients.
