FASEA bypassed consultation on code guidance

23 October 2019
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) could have conducted a pre-release consultation around its code of ethics guidelines with the major financial adviser groups but chose not to do so.

Instead the authority has run into a barrage of criticism from individual advisers and the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) and is now offering a consultation process in November.

However, AFA chief executive, Phil Kewin has told Money Management that he has concerns about the effectiveness of a consultation process in November when the code of ethics is due to be implemented in from 1 January.

Kewin was commenting after he signed off a communication to AFA members in which he said the AFA had used code of ethics guidance released last Friday to go beyond its remit with respect to the management of conflicts of interest to “create its own laws, way above current laws”.

“We simply do not understand how it is possible, when the Corporations Act only requires conflicts to be managed, and the law specifically permits life insurance commissions and other conflicted arrangements, that FASEA could issue a Code of Ethics, that is binding on all financial advisers that appears to completely ban conflicts of interest,” the AFA communication said.

In a subsequent interview with Money Management, Kewin said the issues relate to the FASEA code of ethics guidance could have been resolved if the authority had lived up to an undertaking to consult with adviser groups before it released the guidance.

“Now they are promising us a consultation process in November but I have concerns about how that will work because the code of ethics is due to come into effect on 1 January, next year,” he said.

Kewin expressed particular concern about the fact that the original Standard 3 in the code, dealing with conflicts of interest or duty had been viewed as “reasonable” by advisers but that it had now been subject to substantial change.

Kewin’s comments have come amid concerns that consumer representatives on the FASEA board have been allowed to exercise undue influence.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND