Calls for regulatory competition benchmarks
Australia's two corporate regulators should be held accountable for fostering competition in the financial services space by way of tight legislative mandates.
That is the view of the Customer Owned Banking Association (COBA), who used its submission to the Financial System Inquiry (FSI) to argue for mandated benchmarks for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority (APRA) to encourage healthy competition in the banking sector.
As such, the association said APRA should be accountable to a non-executive board to oversee decision making, with a senior executive appointed to monitor competition within the sector.
"Without embedding this important principle, any other reforms flowing from the Inquiry will be addressing symptoms rather than the underlying cause," it said.
"The legislative and regulatory framework underpinning the sector does not support competition and is not competitively neutral."
Its' grievances included the bank guarantee to large institutions, which COBA said is anti-competitive, and "a disclosure regime that is failing consumers".
Recommended for you
ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of global advisory group Brite Advisors after compensation was paid to an individual by the Compensation Scheme of Last Resort.
Having taken some “quite tough medicine” during its 18-month transformation program, Iress is now doubling down on organic growth in the delivery of its wealth technologies.
The RIAA Conference Australia 2025 will take place later this month, featuring a range of sessions designed for financial advisers.
The month of April enjoyed four back-to-back weeks of growth in financial adviser numbers, with this past week seeing a net rise of five.
