Calls for regulatory competition benchmarks
Australia's two corporate regulators should be held accountable for fostering competition in the financial services space by way of tight legislative mandates.
That is the view of the Customer Owned Banking Association (COBA), who used its submission to the Financial System Inquiry (FSI) to argue for mandated benchmarks for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority (APRA) to encourage healthy competition in the banking sector.
As such, the association said APRA should be accountable to a non-executive board to oversee decision making, with a senior executive appointed to monitor competition within the sector.
"Without embedding this important principle, any other reforms flowing from the Inquiry will be addressing symptoms rather than the underlying cause," it said.
"The legislative and regulatory framework underpinning the sector does not support competition and is not competitively neutral."
Its' grievances included the bank guarantee to large institutions, which COBA said is anti-competitive, and "a disclosure regime that is failing consumers".
Recommended for you
The shift in scale and consolidation has led to substantial growth in large privately owned licensees, which have tipped past 20 per cent of advisers for the first time to make up 28.3 per cent of the industry.
ETF providers Betashares and BlackRock are reporting increased flows for currency hedged vehicles, but an adviser has warned on the potential tax implications of changing currency.
Bravura chair Matthew Quinn is to step down later this year, following the exit of CEO Andrew Russell, while its future priority is digital advice in Australia.
Financial advice has an important role to play in navigating family discussions around inheritance, according to CFS, with younger generations expecting a windfall of more than $500,000 while older ones try to meet their retirement needs.
