Call to use Single Disciplinary Body to reduce, not increase costs

20 May 2021
| By Mike |
expand image

It is important that the winding up of the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) and introduction of the Single Disciplinary Body be leveraged by the Government to reduce the cost impacts on advisers, according to the Stockbrokers and Financial Advisers Association (SAFAA). 

In a pointed submission responding to the Treasury discussion around legislation to establish the single disciplinary body, the SAFAA makes clear that containing regulatory costs is paramount. 

And, in similar fashion to the Financial Planning Association (FPA), SAFAA has urge the coupling of financial adviser registration with the existing authorisation process delivered by Australian Financial Services Licensees. 

There is now a clearly developing agenda on the part of adviser representative organisations that while individual adviser registration is important, it should be delivered within the context of Australian financial services licence (AFSL) authorisations, thus retaining the status licensees and dealer groups. 

“The obligation to register a financial adviser must sit with the financial services licensee on whose behalf the adviser is authorised to provide personal advice to retail clients,” the SAFAA submission said. “Bearing in mind the large cost burden currently imposed on licensees as a result of the significant increases in the ASIC industry funding levy; implementation of Royal Commission recommendations; and the costs associated with the FASEA exam and education requirements any registration fee per adviser must be a nominal one.” 

The SAFAA is also recommending a single registration period per year for all financial advisers be adopted to bring adviser registration into line with other professional registrations. 

Elsewhere in its submission the SAFAA has urged that stockbrokers and investment advisers be amongst those appointed to the panel which will oversee the operations of the Single Disciplinary Body, noting that absence of such diversity had contributed to the failure of FASEA. 

It also expressed concern at suggestions that the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) might have the power to terminate panel members. 

“SAFAA would be concerned if ASIC could exercise this power to terminate a Panel member’s membership simply because the member disagreed with the ASIC-appointed chair,” the submission said. 

Read more about:



Recommended for you


Stay up to date with Australia’s top news and information source for the wealth management industry


sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry


Absolutely agree with you on this Les. That's how I see it too. The client facing "new" SOA document might shrink down a...

2 days ago
Stephen Eedy

Most advisers are now degree-qualified with many years of actual practical industry experience, and are fully-qualified ...

2 days ago
Dominic Widlake

This is all so ridiculous. I have 33 years experience, and have studied hard over the last 4 years to obtain the gov...

2 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

5 months ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

4 months 3 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

5 months ago