Banks, planners face further RC grilling

3 July 2018
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Royal Commission has not finished scrutinising the banks, with letters to some superannuation funds suggesting it intends questioning the degree to which financial planning commissions have impacted member balances.

The Royal Commission also appears set to investigate the role of financial planners with respect to corporate superannuation funds.

A letter from the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry, a copy of which has been obtained by Money Management, has revealed a focus on “commission and contribution arrangements” and relationships with financial planners.

The Royal Commission letter has asked the funds to “set out any commission arrangements (whether contractual or otherwise) between the RSE [superannuation] licensee (or any group of which they are part) or the fund and any financial planning or wealth management entity”.

It also asks that this information include “the percentage of commission paid, when such commission is paid, and which person or entity incurs the cost of the payment, including where in part”.

“Where applicable, identify those arrangements which are known as trailing commissions and the circumstances in which those commissions are charged,” the letter said.

It also asks the funds to identify the total number of members, and the percentage of total members, of the fund who are currently paying fees for commissions to financial advisers employed by, or who are authorised representatives of the RSE Licensee.

“For those members who are subject to commissions, identify the source from which those commissions are paid (for example: from the member’s account, from the return on investment or otherwise),” the letter said.

The document also asks funds to “set out any contribution arrangements (whether contractual or otherwise) between the RSE Licensee (or any group of which they are a part), the fund or any employer-sponsor, and any financial planning or wealth management entity or third party, including the percentage of contribution paid, when and to which entity or person such a contribution is paid, and which person or entity incurs the cost of the contribution, including where in part”.

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 1 day ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week 1 day ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 2 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND