ASIC powers to disqualify directors withstands test
Recent Federal Court decisions have reasserted the powers of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) to disqualify company directors who have failed to fulfil their responsibilities.
The Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia this week dismissed an appeal initiated by Brian Malcolm Culley, who challenged ASIC’s decision to disqualify him from managing corporations for two years.
Culley was disqualified due to his involvement in four failed companies (Oriental Experience, Construction Resources, BMC Special Projects and BM Culley & Associates) and failure to fulfil his duties by allowing the companies to accrue significant statutory debts and to trade while insolvent.
He unsuccessfully made appeals to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, the Federal Court and finally the Full Court of the Federal Court.
ASIC stated that the Full Court’s dismissal of the appeal is significant because it reaffirms ASIC’s power to disqualify directors within a “reasonable time”.
ASIC stated that the recent decisions serve to protect future creditors, investors and employees who may otherwise be involved with a director who has a history of being involved in failed companies.
Recommended for you
ASIC commissioner Alan Kirkland has detailed the regulator’s intentions to conduct surveillance on licensees and advisers who are recommending managed accounts, noting a review is “warranted and timely” given the sector’s growth.
AMP and HUB24 have shared the areas where they are seeking future adviser growth, with HUB24 targeting adding more than 2,000 advisers to the platform.
Bravura Solutions has appointed a new chair and deputy chair to take over from departing Matthew Quinn, while Shezad Okhai picks up another responsibility.
Two advisers say M&A is becoming a “contact sport” as competition heats up to acquire attractive advice firms, while a lack of new entrants creates roadblocks in organic growth opportunities.
