ASIC finds asset consultant fee structures conflicted
The financial services regulator has identified conflicts of interest present in asset consultant business models, which it said needed to be managed properly.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) Commissioner Greg Tanzer said conflicts included fee structures based on preferring services, in-house funds and other products of related parties of the asset consultant.
In some circumstances, asset consultants had to recommend products to multiple clients where capacity to participate in these products might be limited, Tanzer said.
"Asset consultants provide advice to both superannuation trustees and responsible entities and are integral to the investment decisions made by these entities," he said, adding that the overall findings were generally positive.
"The asset consultants we spoke to demonstrated an awareness of, and compliance commitment to, their contractual and licensee obligations," Tanzer said.
ASIC also found a growing trend towards in-house for some or all investment management functions, with the sector also seeing a decrease in clients due to merger and consolidation activity.
Recommended for you
As the 1 January 2026 education deadline looms, the FAAA is predicting as many as 1,000 advisers could exit the profession, triggering a significant experience loss for the profession.
AMP has made an internal promotion to head of business development for wealth distribution, as chief executive Alexis George has said the firm is doubling down on its BDM team.
A Supreme Court of Western Australia jury has issued its verdict regarding unregistered MIS operator Chris Marco, who was on trial for 43 fraud charges, with ASIC stating the verdict ends a “sorry chapter”.
Investment Trends has revealed Australian advisers are increasingly turning to ETFs to provide portfolio diversification, while new inflows for unlisted managed accounts have seen a double-digit drop.
