ASIC finds asset consultant fee structures conflicted
The financial services regulator has identified conflicts of interest present in asset consultant business models, which it said needed to be managed properly.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) Commissioner Greg Tanzer said conflicts included fee structures based on preferring services, in-house funds and other products of related parties of the asset consultant.
In some circumstances, asset consultants had to recommend products to multiple clients where capacity to participate in these products might be limited, Tanzer said.
"Asset consultants provide advice to both superannuation trustees and responsible entities and are integral to the investment decisions made by these entities," he said, adding that the overall findings were generally positive.
"The asset consultants we spoke to demonstrated an awareness of, and compliance commitment to, their contractual and licensee obligations," Tanzer said.
ASIC also found a growing trend towards in-house for some or all investment management functions, with the sector also seeing a decrease in clients due to merger and consolidation activity.
Recommended for you
Insignia Financial has announced the status of the two private equity bidders as due diligence comes to an end, with one bidder opting to pull out.
The corporate regulator has cancelled the AFSL of a Queensland-based financial services provider, having held the licence since mid-2016.
The financial advice industry has reacted to the appointment of Dr Daniel Mulino as the new Minister for Financial Services, with hopes for improvements in legislation and education standards.
With less than one-third of Australian business owners seeing an adviser, Business Health has detailed how advice practices can successfully target this underserved client segment.
