ASIC claims it has no pre-determined compliance rate for advice

ASIC/Bert-Van-Mannen/

12 January 2021
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has claimed not to have a pre-determined compliance rate or test pass rate when it is undertaking advice reviews.

Defending its approach to Report 639 covering advice within superannuation, ASIC said its response to the advice review component within that report had been “commensurate with the concerns identified in that review”.

“While we found that 36% of files did not demonstrate full compliance with the best interests duty and related obligations, this was as a result of procedural, disclosure or record keeping deficiencies and did not indicate the member was at risk of suffering financial or non-financial detriment,” it said.

“A smaller subset of 15% of files indicated that the member was at risk of suffering financial or non-financial detriment.”

“ASIC does not have a pre-determined compliance rate or test pass rate. When ASIC undertakes advice reviews in its projects, it assesses the advice records for compliance and reports on the outcome of the assessment. Further work undertaken by ASIC as a result of the advice reviews depends on the nature and scale of concerns identified. For example, for files reviewed as part of REP 639 where there was an indication that the member was at risk of suffering financial or non-financial detriment, we engaged with the advice licensee about our expectation that they review the advice and where required, remediate those affected members,” the regulator said.

“We note that whether the law should be amended following an ASIC review, such as REP 413 and REP 639, is a policy matter for Government”.

Queensland Liberal backbencher, Bert Van Mannen had used the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Economics and Financial Services to question why ASIC had not used Report 639 to call for major reform of the superannuation advice sector.

“Does a 49% compliance rate pass the test? If so the 2021 ASIC review for life insurance advice delivers a better outcome. Why then would ASIC call for further reforms to life insurance commissions?”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

4 months 3 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

5 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

7 months ago

Commonwealth Bank has formally dropped to zero advisers following LGT Crestone’s acquisition of its advice arm – some six years on from the Hayne royal commission. ...

3 weeks 4 days ago

The FSCP has issued a written direction to an adviser who charged clients “extraordinary fees” for inappropriate and conflicted advice, as well as encouraged them to swit...

1 week ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager. ...

2 weeks 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
92.15 3 y p.a(%)
3