AFA calls out ISA on transparency

19 March 2014
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) has accused Industry Super Australia (ISA) of hypocrisy for not making its Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) submission publicly available, despite its loud calls for transparency.  

AFA CEO Brad Fox said the organisation "selectively" leaked documents condemning FOFA changes, but the formal submission to the Government could not be found at the time of writing.  

But a spokesman for ISA said that was a "matter for Treasury".  

"We have made a comprehensive submission to Government and we expect Treasury will release that as they see fit," he said.  

However, Fox said the lack of clarity in the form of a formal, publicly-available submission was "inconsistent" with calls for transparency.  

"What I don't understand is why, when transparency is so important to the reform of financial services, Industry Super Australia (ISA), which is the modern representation of the union super fund movement and the loudest critic of the amendments, has not made its submission to the Government on the FOFA amendments publicly available," he said.   

"We think it is reasonable to expect full transparency on these types of issues or consumers could question whether they can trust the integrity of the agenda. 

"We have seen gross inaccuracies being reported as facts across a wide range of publications and media programs, so the question has to be asked: how are these actions, which undermine the confidence of baby boomers in personal financial advice, in the best interests of Australia?"  

The AFA CEO defended proposed changes to FOFA as a measure to increase the affordability and availability of financial advice.  

"As a nation, we need more Australians better prepared for retirement, not less," he said.  

"These amendments do not take away the key consumer wins around transparency and in reality it means the law has caught up with the transition advisers had been making over the last 10 years to move to charging for their advice by separate advice fees rather than in-built commissions." 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Ralph

How did the licensee not check this - they should be held to task over it. Obviously they are not making sure their sta...

2 days 17 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

Faking exams and falsifying results..... Too stupid to comment on JG...

2 days 18 hours ago
PETER JOHNSTON- AIOFP

Must agree to disagree with you on this one Keith, with the Banks/Institutions largely out of advice now is the time to ...

2 days 18 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 3 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 1 week ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND